Standard News

Hide Advertisement
  • Business
  • Culture
  • News
  • Technology
  • Trending
Site logo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Massachusetts attorney general bans ‘copycat’ assault weapons

July 20, 2016 | By Reuters
Massachusetts Attorney General Healey speaks about gun violence prevention at the White House in Washington

(Reuters) – Massachusetts will ban the sale of “copycat” assault-style weapons similar to those increasingly used in mass shootings, state Attorney General Maura Healey said on Wednesday.

The move takes effect immediately and is part of stepped-up enforcement of Massachusetts’ ban on military-style assault weapons, she said in a statement.

Advertisement

“The gun industry has openly defied our laws here in Massachusetts for nearly two decades. That ends today,” said Healey, a Democrat.

She said assault rifles had become the weapon of choice in mass shootings. They have been used in massacres in Orlando, Florida; San Bernardino, California; Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado.

Her enforcement notice clarifies what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon under the assault weapons ban. Copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including copies of the Colt AR-15 and the Kalashnikov AK-47, are prohibited in the state.

Despite the law, an estimated 10,000 “copycat” assault weapons were sold in Massachusetts last year, the statement said.

Healey’s statement said gun manufacturers made versions with minor tweaks to various parts of the weapon. Copycat guns are sold, for example, without a flash suppressor or with a fixed instead of folding stock.

Under Healey’s notice, a weapon is a copy or duplicate if its internal operating system is largely the same as those of a specifically banned weapon. The gun also is considered a copy or duplicate if key parts are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon.

Gun dealers with existing stock will have to sell them to dealers out of state.

The Gun Owners’ Action League of Massachusetts, a gun rights advocacy group, criticized Healey’s move in a statement, saying it was unconstitutional and had been done without due process. The group is weighing possible courses of action.

“One thing is certain is that this new interpretation is purely a political stunt and has nothing to do with public safety or law,” said Jim Wallace, the group’s executive director.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by David Gregorio)

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC6J1OX-VIEWIMAGE

← Previous Post Next Post →
Advertisement - Continue reading below
Share  On Facebook

Microsoft to crack down on content promoting extremist acts

NASCAR accused of racial discrimination in lawsuit

‘A Star is Born’ again with Bradley Cooper, Lady Gaga

Uber is added to surge-pricing lawsuit, could prompt arbitration

Man arrested at Trump rally said he wanted to shoot candidate: court papers

More U.S. babies with Zika-related birth defects reported by health agency

Labels release cut-rate music streaming service amid shift to flexible pricing

Trial of ‘Hollywood Arsonist’ begins in Los Angeles

California mayor pleads not guilty in strip poker scandal

Reddit Users Share Their Top Money-Saving Tips and People Online Find It Brilliant

load more Loading posts...

sidebar

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

sidebar-alt

  • About Us
  • Imprint
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy