Standard News

Hide Advertisement
  • Business
  • Culture
  • News
  • Technology
  • Trending
Site logo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Massachusetts attorney general bans ‘copycat’ assault weapons

July 20, 2016 | By Reuters
Massachusetts Attorney General Healey speaks about gun violence prevention at the White House in Washington

(Reuters) – Massachusetts will ban the sale of “copycat” assault-style weapons similar to those increasingly used in mass shootings, state Attorney General Maura Healey said on Wednesday.

The move takes effect immediately and is part of stepped-up enforcement of Massachusetts’ ban on military-style assault weapons, she said in a statement.

Advertisement

“The gun industry has openly defied our laws here in Massachusetts for nearly two decades. That ends today,” said Healey, a Democrat.

She said assault rifles had become the weapon of choice in mass shootings. They have been used in massacres in Orlando, Florida; San Bernardino, California; Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado.

Her enforcement notice clarifies what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon under the assault weapons ban. Copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including copies of the Colt AR-15 and the Kalashnikov AK-47, are prohibited in the state.

Despite the law, an estimated 10,000 “copycat” assault weapons were sold in Massachusetts last year, the statement said.

Healey’s statement said gun manufacturers made versions with minor tweaks to various parts of the weapon. Copycat guns are sold, for example, without a flash suppressor or with a fixed instead of folding stock.

Under Healey’s notice, a weapon is a copy or duplicate if its internal operating system is largely the same as those of a specifically banned weapon. The gun also is considered a copy or duplicate if key parts are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon.

Gun dealers with existing stock will have to sell them to dealers out of state.

The Gun Owners’ Action League of Massachusetts, a gun rights advocacy group, criticized Healey’s move in a statement, saying it was unconstitutional and had been done without due process. The group is weighing possible courses of action.

“One thing is certain is that this new interpretation is purely a political stunt and has nothing to do with public safety or law,” said Jim Wallace, the group’s executive director.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by David Gregorio)

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC6J1OX-VIEWIMAGE

← Previous Post Next Post →
Advertisement - Continue reading below
Share  On Facebook

The Rolling Stones to appear in cinemas worldwide

U.S. officials working to restore public trust in police: attorney general

Former Trump Campaign Chair Paul Manafort, Business Associate Charged With ‘Conspiracy Against the US’ in Connection to Russian Collusion Probe

Lockheed wins $424 million contract for radar emitter simulation products: Pentagon

Watchdog finds much larger Catholic influence on U.S. hospitals

Lawmaker says local officials suspect Orlando shooter aligned with Islamic State

Victim’s last Snapchat starts with dancing, ends in gunfire

New York LGBT bar becomes first U.S. monument to gay rights

New York banana importer gets more prison time for embezzlement

Clooney, Cheadle urge action to stop pilfering of South Sudan resources

load more Loading posts...

sidebar

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

sidebar-alt

  • About Us
  • Imprint
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy