Standard News

Hide Advertisement
  • Business
  • Culture
  • News
  • Technology
  • Trending
Site logo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Lawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

August 2, 2016 | By Reuters
Charleston County Sheriff's Office handout booking photo of Dylann Roof

(Reuters) – Attorneys for a white man accused of killing nine black parishioners in a racially motivated attack at a South Carolina church a year ago argued that their client should not face the death penalty, asserting the punishment is unconstitutional.

Federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Dylann Roof, 22, who is accused of opening fire on a Bible study session at Charleston’s historic Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church on June 17, 2015.

Advertisement

The shooting shook the country and intensified debate over U.S. race relations, which were already roiled by numerous high-profile police killings of unarmed black people.

Attorneys for Roof argued in a document filed in a U.S. District Court in South Carolina on Monday that the federal death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment” and, as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution.

“No one can be lawfully sentenced to death or executed under it, no matter what his crimes,” the attorneys wrote in the motion.

A court ruling that the Federal Death Penalty Act is unconstitutional would allow Roof to plead guilty and proceed to the sentencing phase of his case in which he could be to life in prison without parole, his attorneys said.

In an earlier court filing, federal prosecutors cited a number of factors for seeking the death penalty, saying Roof singled out victims who were black and elderly, and showed no remorse. They also cited “substantial planning and premeditation.”

The argument that the death penalty is unconstitutional is a typical line of defense. The federal trial against Roof is set to begin on Nov. 7.

Federal death sentences are rarely carried out in the United States. Roof also faces a state capital punishment trial, which is scheduled to begin in January.

Roof faces different charges in each case. State prosecutors in South Carolina charged him with murder and attempted murder, while federal prosecutors charged him with 33 counts including hate crimes, obstruction of religion and firearms offenses.

(Reporting by Brendan O’Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC710GR-VIEWIMAGE

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC710GS-VIEWIMAGE

← Previous Post Next Post →
Advertisement - Continue reading below
Share  On Facebook

CIA chief expects release of 9/11 documents to clear Saudi Arabia

Arizona says it has run out of drugs for executions

Trump Threatens Government Shutdown to Pay for Border Wall Mexico Was Supposed to Pay For

Thirteen U.S. states ask court to halt transgender bathroom policy

Clinton offers plan to freeze some college debt, cut tuition

Leading VPN Technology Company Issues Stern Warning After FCC’s New Ruling

U.S. DOT says road travel rose by 2.6 percent in April

Senate votes down proposal to expand FBI surveillance powers

Ex-Rentboy.com CEO near plea deal in prostitution case

Chicago unveils plan for terminal upgrades at O’Hare Airport

load more Loading posts...

sidebar

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

sidebar-alt

  • About Us
  • Imprint
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy