Standard News

Hide Advertisement
  • Business
  • Culture
  • News
  • Technology
  • Trending
Site logo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Ohio appeals U.S. court decision in favor of early voting

May 27, 2016 | By Reuters
File photo of Ohio voters casting their votes at the polls for early voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election in Medina, Ohio

By Kim Palmer

CLEVELAND (Reuters) – The state of Ohio filed a federal court appeal on Thursday seeking to restore a Republican-backed limit on early voting and accelerated voter-registration measures that were seen by civil rights groups as boosting minority turnout.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Michael Watson in Columbus ruled on Tuesday that Ohio violated voters’ rights by reducing the period that ballots could be cast before an election to four weeks from five weeks.

Watson’s decision also struck down Ohio’s elimination of a seven-day window during which residents could both register to vote and cast their ballots all in the same week – a period known as “Golden Week.”

Ohio’s Republican-controlled legislature abolished “Golden Week” and shortened early voting by seven days in 2014, drawing a legal challenge from the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Watson sided with the ACLU and NAACP in finding that both changes, which critics said directly limited opportunities for minority participation in elections, violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and were unconstitutional.

On Thursday, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, a Republican, petitioned the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review Watson’s decision, which he said scrapped a court-approved settlement the state previously reached with the ACLU and NAACP on early voting.

The settlement allowed voters to cast ballots on multiple Sundays leading up to a presidential election and provided for additional evening voting hours, according to ACLU documents.

Husted said Golden Week had become an administrative problem for state elections officials and increased the potential for voter fraud, arguing its elimination had broad bipartisan support.

The Ohio Democratic Party countered with a statement accusing Republican state officials of “defending a law that clear data showed imposed a stark discriminatory impact on Ohio’s African-American voters.”

The appeal came a day after the Ohio General Assembly passed legislation that would require any resident or organization to post a cash bond with a local court in order to keep polling stations open later than scheduled on election day.

Judges in Ohio have on occasion ordered some polls to extend their hours because of voting equipment problems, major traffic issues and severe weather, including during the 2016 primaries.

Opponents of the bill have said it violates the 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which expressly prohibits the imposition of a “poll tax.”

(Reporting by Kim Palmer in Cleveland; Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Peter Cooney)

tagreuters.com2016binary_LYNXNPEC4Q002-VIEWIMAGE

← Previous Post Next Post →
Advertisement - Continue reading below
Share  On Facebook

Criminal charges possible in killing of Cincinnati gorilla

Obama to meet with Flint, Michigan residents on water crisis

Heroin use at 20-year high in U.S. drug ‘epidemic’, U.N. says

Box Office – ‘Captain America: Civil War’ starts summer with sizzling $181.8 million

AFGE: Trump’s Governmentwide Review Must Include Billions in Wasteful Contractor Spending

Florida to begin aerial spraying of insecticides to control Zika

Anger as ex-Stanford swimmer freed after three months for sex assault

U.S. Democrats pressure Republicans for bipartisan Zika funding

Ex-San Francisco 49er charged with assault of elderly man, son

Which ‘La Raza’? Trump comments cause confusion over group’s role

load more Loading posts...

sidebar

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

sidebar-alt

  • About Us
  • Imprint
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy